I think one of the problems is that there’s no such thing as an Alternative or Experimental Literature scene. Almost all of the books published are rather conservative. Sort of like if Cliff Richards dominated the music world.
The experimental books I have browsed have either been too pretentious to read or too ‘emo’. Usually a bit of both. Generally unreadable, unless you want to impress people.
But then any story told wholly in words seems conservative by medium alone. Especially since there’s never any variation from the standard font, although I guess there are many good reasons for that. The only book I’ve read in handwriting rather than print was Badjelly the Witch by Spike Milligna, the well-known typing error. Illustrations in novels, if they existed in adult novels, which they don’t, tend to merely reflect what has been written rather than show something new in themselves. If they did that, you could probably classify them as comic books. A Series Of Unfortunate Events had interesting crinkly pages, but you’d never see that in an adult book.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that I wish adult books were allowed to be more like children’s books and comic books. It’s not like books these days are technologically restricted to adhere to a particular look and style. But then two authors have had their book covers ‘adultified’ (Terry Prachett and J.K. Rowling), and no authors have ever had their books covers ‘juvenilified’ (except perhaps the alternative cover of the latest Jeffrey Archer book), so I guess that particular march of progress is a backwards one.
January 20, 2007 at 2:12 pm |
Is a book just text, which could be printed online, written in the sky, or daubed on the side of a cow and still be the same, or is it a physical object? Is hardback more valid than paperback? Is a leatherbound book better than stapled photocopy?
January 20, 2007 at 4:01 pm |
B.T.W. interesting two-piece article on writing by Zadie Smith from the Guardian website:
http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/generalfiction/story/0,,1989004,00.html
January 20, 2007 at 8:09 pm |
I’m not sure if you’re giving me other things to think about, or if you’re implying that I’m missing the point of what a book is…
I like that article by Zadie, which I will finish when I get home from work. It reminds me of this stuff I’d write here if I didn’t think people would say “who is this unpublished boy who thinks he knows what writing is all about better than the rest of us?”
January 21, 2007 at 1:11 pm |
No, not at all, I just think it’s interesting that what bookstores define as ‘gift books’ tend to be more expensively produced than ‘normal’ books -the value of the physical object is greater than the value of the text.
What about books that have been adapted into a film, and then republished in a junior edition with fewer words and bigger text? I think they could have been juvenilified, or juveniled.
January 22, 2007 at 11:01 pm |
I don’t count those junior adaptations as anything real. There are also the classic novels redone in the same way — we have a few of them at work. The voice of the author has been lost and they’re just bastardised versions.